Verdict Soft Copy is State Document that Must be Guarded
DG of Badilag Wahyu Widiana (center) stressing the importance of storing and publishing court verdicts as state documents.
Bandung | badilag.net/english
One crucial issue was succesfully identified in the workshop on verdict anonimation in Bandung last week (4/6). During this time, besides there are still weaknesses in terms of doing anonimation, it is still often found that soft copy of the verdict was dispersed. As a result, these verdicts are very difficult to be traced which inhibit anonimation process and verdict publication.
Director General of Religious Courts Body (Badilag) Wahyu Widiana calls this problem as a non-technical issues because technically, verdict anonimation and publication has been regulated in the Decision of Chief Justice (SK KMA) Number 144/2007 on Information Transparency in the Court. Meanwhile, file management was not specifically discussed in the decision which was signed by Prof. Bagir Manan.
"In terms of verdict publication, the problem of anonimation may seem simple, but there are non-technical issues beyond anonimation, like the difficulty of finding file or soft copy of the verdict. This must be solved first," said Wahyu Widiana.